|
Weapons that need (extra) ratings
|
|
03-09-2007, 07:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-19-2007 10:45 PM by cutejohn291.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Weapons that need (extra) ratings
Moderaters please DON'T close this thread because more weapons can be added to this thread. If you members can propose some weapons , it'll be greatly appreciated.
Good(ok) weapons that has no rating Currently none Good(ok) weapons that need more rating(s) Currently none Weapons that are good(ok) but wait for price to drop (Don't rate these) Currently none Weapons you think that are suck and need a suck rating Currently none Chinese stock guide : http://www.neopets.com/~cleverjohn |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 07:27 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
I see that you're making a fuss about this again Cutejohn291, just to give the new raters their first job, eh?
Anyway, Sophies Magic Hat seems to be comparable with Mystical White Cloak since it does and instead of and .
I'm not a fan of non-100% freezers or dual-duties. |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 08:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2007 08:46 AM by CadaverGrey.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
WiltChamberlain13 Wrote:I see that you're making a fuss about this again Cutejohn291, just to give the new raters their first job, eh? I find this thread helpful. I wouldn't have been able to comb through that large database to know which one needs rating. Not that I am a rater, but sometimes when I need a raters opinion on a weapon it's really frustrating to see there is none given. Battledome BattleSense : A Battledome Blog - http://battledome-battlesense.blogspot.com/ Latest entry: "Stub: Cheapest set I can think of" (19 Sept 2007) |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 09:45 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
Bucket O Water now has a rating. Personally, I think a thread like this is helpful in that at the moment I KNOW there are weapons out there in need of ratings (it's being worked on), but some are junk and aren't confusing to people, while some are things that there's a lot of active interest in. I'm hoping that the things that show up on a thread of this type are things that people actually have some interest in, and yeah, it saves time hunting in the data base that could be better spent rating.
You can pretend to care, but you can't pretend to BE THERE! |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 10:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2007 10:28 AM by rabid_schnauzer.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
I haven't tested it myself, but I have repeatedly run across rumours that Sophies Magic Hat also defends some amount of earth in addition the the Fire, Dark and Physical currently listed in the IDB. It might be worth having someone re-test before it gets rated.
"Siggy? whats the real name of the item? *sigh* im new to this whole battledome items....so, sorry! " |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 10:41 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
If you're going to link the items, could you link as so:
Bucket o Water It makes for easier rating. I'll start on another rating streak when I get home from school. ![]() My sig no longer requires a spoiler, yay! |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 11:24 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
What's the coding to get that linked that way?
Battledome BattleSense : A Battledome Blog - http://battledome-battlesense.blogspot.com/ Latest entry: "Stub: Cheapest set I can think of" (19 Sept 2007) |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 02:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2007 05:33 PM by graphitesmoothie.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
You have to search for it on the main page, and then copy/paste the URL for where it says "In-depth analysis" as so:
Code: [url=(paste the URL here)]Weapon Name[/url]Edit: I figured out you can do it like this also: Code: [url=http://idb.finalhit.org/?WEAPON+NAME+HERE]Weapon name[/url]![]() My sig no longer requires a spoiler, yay! |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 06:22 PM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
Oh, THAT kinda linking. My bad, didn't get it the first time...
Battledome BattleSense : A Battledome Blog - http://battledome-battlesense.blogspot.com/ Latest entry: "Stub: Cheapest set I can think of" (19 Sept 2007) |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 07:32 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
I like this thread, too -- like VermontHermit said, it helps us know which weapons people are interested in, so we can make sure they get rated first. Keep them coming! And feel free to post the names of weapons you think suck, too. Bad ratings are fun to write.
"Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass." |
|||
|
03-09-2007, 10:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2007 10:41 PM by cutejohn291.)
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Weapons that need (extra) info
Thanks you all
![]() The list is updated , if you got any proposition , let me know
Chinese stock guide : http://www.neopets.com/~cleverjohn |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|






and
instead of
and
.



![[Image: MSsig.png?char=Smooothie&bg=rog]](http://www.monopolysquad.co.uk/openmssig/MSsig.png?char=Smooothie&bg=rog)

