I am curious as to this research and other things which people are using as evidence and what not. We are on day two; usually by this time there is little to go on; unless a dreamer gets super lucky. Sure you might be roletrading, but have you not heard of role faking? Just because someone gives you a plausible role, doesn't mean it is true. Anywhoo... I am going to stick with my vote for nobody, as I don't see anything substantial to go on.
weee5067 Wrote:Yes, a bandwagon started on zero evidence against an innocent with useful powers will certainly be helpful, won't it? 
If we want a bandwagon with even a remotely-plausible reason, I'd go after Mattybeyblade, just because it annoys me that he misinterpreted a pretty clear rule and confused other people. 'Course, that's not really a good reason, but at least "He's annoying" is better than nothing at all.
Edit: Ah, forgot the pretty colours again.
You surely wouldn't condemn me just because I read a rule wrong. Anyway, you and Felica cleared that up for me, so thanks. As for the bandwagon, there's 1/6 or 1/3 chance we could hit a baddie. So we must take risks. I'm not supporting the bandwagon here, I just think that we need to get the game going, before the badguys start to pick us off.
Infact, seeing as there was no kill last night, then perhaps we can make a lead simply from the people who weren't online.
EDIT: Turns out everyone showed up. I'm lost now.
It seems to me that with quite a bit less than a 50% chance of hitting a baddie, it's actually a bad idea to start a bandwagon, but that's just logic for you. If you're at least twice as likely to take out a good person as you are to hit a bad person...well, think about it. And, while it is strange that no one died last night, it's certainly not unheard of for protectors to have amazing luck or for bad teams to simply not send in a list of who to kill. Assuming there actually are bad teams...hmmm.
[color=brown]I was thinking along those same lines really. I'm not really sure if there IS baddies, instead there's maybe just the different innocent teams.
I agree with your logic, a bandwagon is a pretty big risk to take. I don't know whether or not we should chance it. This game keeps twisting in strange ways.
unvote: weee
vote: nobody
for now, until a better lead surfaces.
Well, I see the bandwagon that started on Jasmine a good thing - we now know she's innocent, it forced her hand. Maybe we should pick someone else random and see what happens?
Unvote: No one
Vote: drspyder
Being inactive doesn't help anyone... 
I suppose that makes sense.
unvote: nobody
vote: drspyder
Edit: I forgot colour 
Almost forgot about WW lol
vote:nobody till we get some solid evidence on someone not circumstantial which is all that we see for wee.
Leader Board updates:
weee5067 (5): Ekul3333, Metalwarrior, shadownight, e4e5Nf3Nc6Bb5, Heidirose
Nobody (4):Katya, weee5067, Asynchrony, firestorm64
mattybeyblade (2): i_like_trains_, Q77
Cyclone (1): WIS
drspyder (2): cooldude42192, mattybeyblade
Edit: added Firestorm
Man does my timing stink
I feel special
Apolgigies Q, i like this color. its serving a purpose. but i will bold it so highlighting it is easier.
Boo, ekul, white is bad .
I will vote:Jasmine because while she believes that ekul is innocent, she hasn't made a (very apparent) fuss about the fact that there is a majority on her. I don't think this is very logical, perhaps a resignation to the fact that she is evil? or something. I too believe that ekul is innocent, but he turns and votes for me, I wouldn't hesitate to vote to kill him, no matter what.
Wait, that totally contradicts itself, doesn't make much sense in hindsight.
Unvote:Jasmine
Vote:Drspyder