After doing some further research, I think I can believe that ekul and jas are both innocents.
unvote: weee
vote: matteyblade
We're not going to get anywhere unless we start executing people.
weee5067 Wrote:[color=red]E4, none of that makes sense to me. Of course anyone getting a vote on them would claim innocence, whether it's true or not - why bother making a point of it?
K, perhaps I should clarify. Instead of claiming innocence, you posted, "there is no proof against me," which seems like a remark more typical of evil players. Nothing too definite obviously, but just minor details that I factor in when trying to predict someone's alignment.
Quote:And by your logic, it's actually less suspicious to start a bandwagon, because apparently, it's something baddies don't usually do. Therefore, wouldn't an intelligent baddie purposely start bandwagons, seeing as it would make them seem like an innocent?
Well, if you put it that way, then it becomes a sort of "But that's just what he wants me to think, so I'll do the opposite… but maybe that's what he wants me to think… so I'll not do the opposite… etc sort of thing." All that aside, I believe that bandwagon leads eg Ekul are less-likely to be bad because if the result turns up innocent, then the bandwagon starter would attract suspicion.
I haven't played many games yet, but I haven't really seen a failed bandwagon backfiring on the starter. After all, it's guesswork no matter what side you're on, isn't it? Unless you were claiming to be a dreamer, you can simply say "Ooops, my bad. Someone else try." Moot point, though, seeing as I no longer suspect Ekul.
Interesting little argument going on here, indeed. I personally believe that bandwagons are totally random, unless started in the late game while the innocents are still clueless or if the baddies are pretending to be dreamers.
And Jasmine, the bad teams usually have full knowledge of who's who on their team.
Anyways, vote time... how about I vote: nobody in order to see what kind of punishment our bloodthirsty(/evict-thirsty?) mistress gives us for voting nobody again. Of course, nothing could happen... but mfeh D:
People stop using white and yellow, please. D:
Vote: Cyclone for now. Random, as apparently the thing between ekul and weeee (Jasmine) has been sorted out. Forgot to vote yesterday. =x
The leader board updates (and not because it was asked for)
weee5067 (5): Ekul3333, mattybeyblade, Metalwarrior, shadownight, e4e5Nf3Nc6Bb5
Nobody (4): cooldude42192, Katya, weee5067, Asynchrony
mattybeyblade (2): i_like_trains_, Q77
Cyclone (1): WIS
(For clarification purposes I meant you need to vote... it doesn't matter if it is a nobody or a person... as long as it is a vote and please bold them and make them black text. I like all the colorful posts but yellow and white are hard to see.)
Edit: I was talling while WIS posted so I added his vote.
Cyclone Wrote:What time does day end?
Noon NST
We need information, and a majority will assist on getting that. I will jump on the bandwagon and Vote: Jasmine
Yes, a bandwagon started on zero evidence against an innocent with useful powers will certainly be helpful, won't it? 
If we want a bandwagon with even a remotely-plausible reason, I'd go after Mattybeyblade, just because it annoys me that he misinterpreted a pretty clear rule and confused other people. 'Course, that's not really a good reason, but at least "He's annoying" is better than nothing at all.
Edit: Ah, forgot the pretty colours again.