iDB Community Forum

I think what ekul said has some basis. He mentions his proof almost as a dream. I think we should believe him. It's only day 2, if he's wrong then innocents still have majority to take him out.
vote: weeee

Trains, you'll agree that we need a corpse to see how is this mess setted. There wasn't a corpse the past night, and I don't know if there will be one tonight.

In the meantime, I shall Vote: Jasmine

Cyclone Wrote:...Er. What was the proof on Jasmine, again? I must confess I don't understand Ekul's post. o.O

There isn't any, really... Ekul's just being Ekul, it's the way he plays. I think he's trying to generate activity, to force someone's hand... or he's just being Ekul

ekul idea is really good
Vote: Jasmine

I can tell you right now, Ekul has zero proof on me (unless he's a dreamer on a baddie team, but I don't think those exist o_0). I'm definitely someone innocents should want to have around, though due to the quiet night, I can't prove it just yet. PM me if you want, and I'll explain.

Also, mattybeyblade, we did all hear Felica - she said that if you as an individual don't vote, there could be consequences. Not if we as a group don't vote someone out of the tent. A misinterpretation like that is a rather senseless reason to jump on a bandwagon, so I certainly hope you have more thought than that backing up any votes you make in this game.

For right now, I'm going to vote: Ekul unless someone can give me proof that he's innocent, because it seems like only a baddie would be able to accuse at random without worrying about hitting and weakening their own team.

Vote: Nobody

I don't agree in Ekul's tactis; but I also don't really like Wee's response.. either way I am just going to vote how I voted; and see if anything else comes up.

Ah, seems as though Ekul isn't a baddie. Well, I guess I'll just wait and see if anyone claiming to be a dreamer shows up, then.

Unvote: Ekul
Vote: Nobody

Hmm, well the bandwagon was a bit random and I wasn't planning jump on. However, after seeing weee's overreaction, revenge vote, and subsequent cover-up, I do believe now that she does have really good chances of being a baddie.

Vote: Weee

Quote:Ekul has zero proof on me

^ As opposed to the "I'm innocent lol" response usually offered by innocents

Quote:I'm definitely someone innocents should want to have around

^ Seems as though she is referring to innocents as a separate group

Quote:only a baddie would be able to accuse at random

^ I believe baddies don't usually lead accusations since they would have to knowingly accuse innocents (since they can't hit their teammates)

Quote:Ah, seems as though Ekul isn't a baddie.

^ Sudden, full circle change seems odd after Katya becomes suspicious of her response

E4, none of that makes sense to me. Of course anyone getting a vote on them would claim innocence, whether it's true or not - why bother making a point of it? And the comment about being someone the innocents should want around is because my first WW game, I was a plain innocent, meaning that I really couldn't do anything to help my team. Why should anyone bother keeping a PI alive? This time, I'm actually useful.

And by your logic, it's actually less suspicious to start a bandwagon, because apparently, it's something baddies don't usually do. Therefore, wouldn't an intelligent baddie purposely start bandwagons, seeing as it would make them seem like an innocent? Your logic is actually even more flawed than mine supposedly is, because most WW games have two or more baddie teams, and so a baddie could very well get lucky and accuse someone on a different baddie team.

What changed my mind about Ekul was talking to cooldude. It had nothing to do with Katya, except for that I had to make a new post rather than just editing my old one.

Edit: Ooops, forgot to colour my post I'll keep that in mind in the future, cooldude.