kk. lol... i like the votes on me, and all of you that ive been pressing there buttons all day. i thought 2 of you handled it really well, and 2 of you fell the way i thought you would. the only comment ill make is... out of the 5 people i pm'd. i liked Benladesh's best. i PURPOSELY planned this this morning, i am a innocent new Yorker, and i figure, that if we can bloody get 5 or so people to "join a bandwagon O.o" and see there response, we might be able to figure out what's going on... here's some stuff i have to point out, and lol like i said, half of you are going to be like... o reverse psychology and all that jazz, but no. these are true facts, and any experienced WW player will know them.
1. No way would a baddie put himself in what i did today, i purposely pm'd 5 people i was iffy about ( knowing at least 1 of them would ~cough~ <reveal me> ~cough~ worked just like i wanted too, though wind's response was so mono-tone i couldn't get anything from it ), too see how they would re-act. i put subtle clues in each pm, that not everyone got, Benladesh caught the "we" and that was the only one that anyone acknowledged, but anyway, back too my point, there's no way a 1mt or baddie in a group would reveal himself and try too let people decide whether or not to kill him. it wouldn't work if you thought you could get away with it, and a person that knows this game would never be dumb enough to try. so digest that, and see what i mean. i don't care if you agree/disagree.
2. i know my plan only goes as far as the majority's of people's ideas go. and i know that, but today, i established... ~ and if you look carefully over my talk, i definitely intentually stressed my conversation with people i thought were trying too much too PROVE im a baddie, while i did nothing a baddie would do, actually the exact opposite. so like there trying to get in on the good sides of innocents, which in turn, in my eyes, showed that they were very suspicious... ~ that out of my 5 people i pm'd ~and i wont name names, but its pretty easy in my talks who i meant~ there are 2 very questionable people. now i wont be pulling any of this weird physo stuff tomorrow, but this morning it worked very good. i pushed people's buttons, kinda tried to see what they say under pressure, and i established that 2 were good, 2 were questionable, and 1 was neutral and didn't talk too me.
3d. thing... you all do know i was starting a bandwagon to test my little experiment, and that i have nothing on graph ( like i said ) and that saying theres no randomizer ( like bunny confirmed ) i
Unvote: Graph
Vote: Nobody
and i apologize too the 2 people ( u know who u are ; ), ive both said your names in this post ) that i thought did this the right way and arnt on my suspicions list.
Now for some other things...
addressing silver, i also was testing you, while long term players i think know this game ( as in WW, not mafia ) way better then me, and they lie better. i was wondering just were you stood, i like your re-actions to the way i prodded at you. not out-right accusing me, which would of made me think you were a baddie, just subtly pointing that out, and that was another test i threw in there. i like how you handled it... another pass in my book
addressing duke... i like the Mafia terminology too... thats were i got my wacky sense of playing... from going through that.
and again i wont be pulling this again, i only do this on the first day,
.