iDB Community Forum

At this point in the game, we don't have any real evidence to go on. Saying that things are "suspisious" is pretty pointless unless you think the person has a post requirement or something. That is why I don't support the idea of voting for someone on day one. Mostl likely, at least 2/3rds of the people in this game are innocent. If there are 2 baddy teams with nightkill abillities, which looking back through several of the old IDB WW games, seems to be the typical setup, it would be very difficult for the innocents to win, as AT MOST, they only control 2/3rds of the kills until they kill off the first Baddy team.

Because of that ratio, a random execution (which is all a day 1 execution really amounts too, as just about any behavior could be constructed as "suspicious" in some way or another) will probably have AT LEAST a 2/3rds chance of hitting an innocent. Even worse, there's a chance that innocent could be an important one, who's death would be an even bigger blow to the innocents than the death of a baddy would be to the baddy team. (Dreamers (which there are usually 2 of, 1 for each baddy team), rezzers, and protectors come to mind as fitting this catagory). So really, day 1 excutions have a better chance of hurting the innocents than the baddy.

As far as behavioral analysis goes...

In my opinion, unless there is something which STRONGY supports the idea that someone has a post requirement, it's pretty useless.

Why? EVERYONE, regaurdless of what thier role actually is, is trying to convince you that they aren't a baddy. Anyone can be swayed by anyone's arguments, even if those arguments may prove to be wrong, if the arguer supports thier argument better than anyone else. Similarilly, anyone can make a mistake. Both baddies and innocents can argue for or against the innocence of anyone, baddy or innocent. A smart baddy can act in a way which doesn't make them seem "suspicious," and an innocent can be made to seem "suspicious" by a baddy. We need something more solid to execute someone on, and we're not getting it on day 1.

See, sexy, this is helping us. The ones who react badly to threats of evilness, are probably evil.

rofl. was that geared at me silver? please wait for my post tonight then, as i am guessing you will see stratagy in what i did.

but i see the point that your trying to make, and while i am kinda un-aware of it, ill do my best to make sure i keep all my thoughts game-wise here.

EDIT: TMC i agree

Ekul, I am a long-time player as well as MC of WW here. I'm just pointing out my own observations from my own experience. However, you are jumping on ever comment and defending yourself to the hilt. Was I suspicious enough to change my vote? No. Therefore, why are jumpy?

Hey silver would I be considered a semi-long-time player?

Also, obi, I once had a royal chef role with a posting requirement of foods, but I was inocent. Even that doesn't hint to anything truthfully. Werewolf Ever After

Now was the bunny bugs or babs?

Ekul you will realize that in WW not everything goes as planned and that your plan is not always everyone elses and when peoples plans meet things don't always go as you wanted it too.

Right now you go as bad to me, you are taking everything personally and over reacting to everything.

Yeah, well I do too, Ben. I remember I was OMT once and I left an heir and the MC said he kiled himself but the switcher person switched who they attacked and them. I was freaking out thinking he commited suicide... Hahaha....pretty dumb. I think it was WIS.... Itwas Krycsms in the ghost town MC'd by WIS.

Yeah I think you've earned that title

Posting requirements are generally pretty random and not many MC's do them... I won using mine though... (well.. I pretended I had more of a requirement than I did once since I was blabbering about some voodoo that would turn me immortal or something... anyone with me that game might remember how messed up that was it was like ww 15 or somethign).... so you can't really ever tell with them. I'd rather look at the content of people's post.

oogabooga Wrote:Also, obi, I once had a royal chef role with a posting requirement of foods, but I was inocent. Even that doesn't hint to anything truthfully. Werewolf Ever After

No, posting requirements in general don't make someone a baddy, but if they have a post requirement which is something charactaristic of a baddy in whatever the game is themed on...

Oh the drama....All I have to say is Duke, it isn't against the rules to edit, edit away. Silver's point was just alert people of what you're editing, but you don't have to, edit as much as you want and what you want

Also, Duke watch what you're saying. The words you're throwing around can lead to a flame war very fast, so just tone it done a bit, it is just a game after all.  

Also, I love the sentence, "you are suspicious", everyone uses it, and rarely is it used right. Figure out what I mean by that and you all get a cookie.

*disclaimer* cookie is by no means game related, and I have direct judgement over whether I give you a cookie or call you names. I have full right to leave red herrings in my wake as I'm an evil MC.

EDIT: And I like the term mafioso, use it more

EDITDEUX: I started in WW 5, that makes me the most senior ww player here, mwhahahahahaha

I forgot to add my vote for ekul

Vote:ekul

Unless he can prove his innocence. its the best lead so far.