10-06-2006, 08:36 PM
jakachuy Wrote:Kugetsu Wrote:I've had the bookie-type role before (which this seems to be like). I lived to the END of the game and was never correct in my guesses a single time.
I really don't think he's that much a threat at this point.
tell me this, if you didn't know asy was an important role, just an uncleared person, and you had a neutral who could be a very big threat, who would you go for? the one who is a known threat, or the one who could be a big help.
Tell me, GAMBLE OR PLAY IT SMART!
I think what you're trying to tell me is that killing someone off just because there's no one cleared is "playing it smart". That's very... simplistic thinking, and while not necessarily incorrect, it's not right either. There are also pros to keeping someone like that alive, and cons for not killing those that arent cleared, which is the exact opposite of what you said and just as true.
It's not black and white like that.
Anyway,
Vote - MetalWarrior
Yep, better be right about this...
(which I agree with at the moment. Why kill a known neutral that the innocents can possibly benefit from when you can kill someone that's evil and isn't going to help the innocent team in any way?)