Q77, you're the neutral. Meta is innocent. I am innocent. I know what it says. You just have your gambling problem, and are not on a side. You've been using US to gain vigi shots. well, I can't let you finish that. THAT is why we tried to execute you.
I finally get an answer for what Q77 is supposed to do.
This is kind of desperate intent of killing him, with the gamble-vigi theory, but, seems like jaka's bandwagon is losing the strengh that he had in previous days, so, I will not set a vote until I get some real data about why we must kill Q77 ASAP.
Exactly my point. And q77 also, I knew you would be killed eventually, but I still had to prove i was the confused hare. That was why I helped you then... Before I learned what you did. and skunk needed to be off-guard.
LOL NIGHT AIN'T OVER YET. duh. jaka-Suspicious much? =O
it's night, and ooga, look at q77's post, he says he will kill us all if we vote for him. He USED US INNOCENTS to help himself, and now that we all knwo about it, and you think voting the person who helped get rid of many baddies needs to go?
Ooga, night is not over.
So then, I shall remain on my statements, no vote until I get convincing data, and for you Q77 and jaka, are the least trustable ones for this moment.
Edit: What kind of skill he is using, just to know how he used us for his benefit?
And why in Werebunny's name are YOU trustable good sir? 0_o
In all honesty, the point is thus- he's not good, he's not bad. If he's the last one alive, we (the innocents) don't get first place. We get second/third. He probably has a good deal of kills now, due to his role, so he could kill a bunch of people in one burst if he wanted to. I don't think he's that dangerous, but if it comes down to four, or five innocents and him, he'll win by killing us all.
For some reason, this reminds me of how Forte won WereRaven.
Having 20+ vigilante shots isn't dangerous?
Who are you and what is your IQ?
Ok, I think we found the original OMT.
q77, if you're so concerned about me being a baddie, why not kill me?