iDB Community Forum

Spaz got me killed... I got Blk Mage killed (well I'm taking credit anyway)... now it's Blk Mage's turn to continue the chain.

Psst, kiddies, no absolute statements in Groupies. This is the first and last warning =)

Actually i don't think that you really did much to kill me, i was already digging a hole in which looking back i did do what i wanted to happen. protect those with roles and target me a civilian.

But if there is some way it would happen i would say kugetsu. But it won't but it might help.

Conrad Heyer is part of the Norsefire regime, in charge of surveillance. He was most likely a dreamer for sutler.

EDIT: That means whoever gave you the tip on conrad(or just a guess, in that case don't worry about this) is leading you in the right dirrection, or was it a move by creedy granting him a reflection?

It was to my great suprise that I died, because I am guilty of doing nothing, really. Or nothing interesting. Oh well, I guess being slightly boring does that to you. *looks guilty, for no real reason*

Sirhatter, I suggest you reveal who gave you the info on TOSO being cleared or face death. Also sirhatter has been MIA since he said TOSO was cleared, which was a lie.

I think someone should try executing Kugetsu, just because I'm bored and want to see what would happen. It'd be more interesting than nobody.

chicken Wrote:Spaz got me killed... I got Blk Mage killed (well I'm taking credit anyway)... now it's Blk Mage's turn to continue the chain.

Psst, kiddies, no absolute statements in Groupies. This is the first and last warning =)

Umm... "no absolute statements" makes no sense, particularly since there has never been any rule against it in any WW game I've ever seen. I'm guessing you assumed I actually had concrete reasons for saying Catercation was evil, in which case what I said would be against the rules. But I didn't, it was just intuition/intelligent guess.

So, now I'm even more convinced that Cateraction is evil, killing him tomorrow would be a good idea.

BTW, the Bodyguards-are-evil-and-killing-for-Sutler theory is incorrect, didn't you notice that I, a bodyguard died as an innocent.

EDIT: Yay, I was right, V wasn't innocent. BTW, Bunnylover, maybe you should have looked at the front page before making assumptions.

Everything went exactly as planned. I'll leave it up to you to figure out if I'm bluffing. Now let us see if you guys can pick up where I left off.

Well, Mr. Sutler, it does seems that you are both blind and mute now. Without your second in command to do your bidding, there is no way you can run this country without contact to the surface, now can you?

You can't hide forever.

Bunny, you can't go making up un-written rules in the middle of the game, no matter how logical they supposedly are. Making a statement based upon non-revealed information without mentioning the non-revealed evidence is a regular practice and I can't recall a time I've seen it edited out, even if it is borderline against the rules. But in any case I wasn't even doing that.

BTW, I'm pretty sure your theory is at least partially wrong. Natually I can't reveal why I think this.

chicken Wrote:Making a statement based upon non-revealed information without mentioning the non-revealed evidence is a regular practice

Not in my games.

Certainly this isn't against the rules since these are rather clearly stated in the game.

Early on in the game, the kills that were marked with the V symbol were innocents, but past a certain point, notice how ALL of them were against Sutler's men.

Decide as you will. But I very happy that my plan worked so brilliantly.