Quote:Originally posted by Bunnylover@Oct 17 2005, 03:41 PM
Funny how ww goes in cycles. There was like an entire 10 games where everyone did a no vote or just random votes first day because no one wanted to do a first day execution. Well first people did first day execution, didn't like the results, did no execution, and now 1st day execution has started up again.
[b]Vote: o_0 Your post gave me all the first day information I need that will tell me that your going to be a useless bandwagonner poster and or evil by quickly bandwagonning. Anyway in my experiences newer bad guys always like to post fairly quickly after the game starts. (this isn't related to o_0 just saying) [/b]
...
You do realize that there are three pages of posts before me.
And, as an experienced Mafia player, I do know that baddies tend to post early. But that's only if they're inexperienced. :-/
Last game was a good game- experienced people ended the game rather than newbies who never post. It's a rather vile pattern to vote out the people who actually try in the game. I saw it as a MC and as a player and I think it's dumb.
And first day executions again might have something to do with me :oops:
Quote:Originally posted by Kugetsu+Oct 17 2005, 08:47 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Kugetsu @ Oct 17 2005, 08:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-1d31l@Oct 17 2005, 02:40 PM
Since people are already voting for the king and haven't read the "You cannot vote for king" bit. We should make it- Whoever votes for king gets auto executed. Why? A peasant saying "Your a witch" in the midevil times to the queen they would be executed o_o.
[b]Vote: Nobody [/b]
Um... read the thread, you can vote for king. [/b][/quote]
My bad X_X was half blind when clucky was talking to garfield. But voting for the king o_o? Wouldn't the king just say "How dare he. Sir 1d31l-a-lot please take him to the guillotine room". He isn't going to say "Aww im a werewolf funky o_o.
Unvote: Nobody
Vote: 0_o
The way bunny played Wereraven was funky :3. And his/her (sorry) detectivity was incredible =)
Explores the Forest
whee =D why are we doing this? ._.
silver, calm down it's just random voting, or atleast mine was. besides, 'tis always fun to put a vote on a supermod for a few seconds. unvote: Forte if it's that important.
Going back to the thing about no groupies, I'm really not sure, for the first time in over twenty WW games, if I want to go for a first day execution.
edit: fixed tags
Ohh great i come to pages of 5 pages of spam and pointless votes >.<
I'm holding my vote for now. Reading all thing and looking for someone who might be a baddie to actually vote for.
Quote:Originally posted by sexysilver@Oct 17 2005, 04:03 PM
Last game was a good game- experienced people ended the game rather than newbies who never post. It's a rather vile pattern to vote out the people who actually try in the game. I saw it as a MC and as a player and I think it's dumb.
And first day executions again might have something to do with me :oops:
Nobody said that the game will end with a bunch of inactive players, we just said that Forte tends to somehow be evil and trick the innocents...
And what about me? I did too- does that make me evil this game? o_o
Quote:Originally posted by garfield22222@Oct 18 2005, 03:02 AM
... smart person... *remembers how Forte constantly managed to fool the inoccents last time* ... you just made me want to vote for him more...
Oh, and I dunno if I should be a beta tester... I mean explore the forest. Sure I may be able to obtain countless riches, but what if something bad happens, like I meet up with Trogdor?
He would probably burninate you. :P
Quote:Nobody said that the game will end with a bunch of inactive players, we just said that Forte tends to somehow be evil and trick the innocents...
Smart is good, but those that are smart also tend to be tricky, no?
I'm pretty sure you can do both a no vote and a vote for someone else together. At least it doesn't say in the rules you can't. :unsure: So if you want a no vote and to vote for someone do both then closer to the execution time if we can't get someone we could swing it to a no vote easier I guess? *is confused*